The entire world has been smashed over the head with the Green movement. I feel like I 'm getting dirty looks if I don't use those reusable bags at the grocery store. I'm not saying going green and being conscious of our impact is a bad thing, but why do auto makers make it so darn hard to do the right thing?
The market leader in the hybird market is the Toyota Prius which looks about as good as a steaming barnyard pile. So along comes Honda and instead of breaking the mold and making a good looking hybrid they basically just make a copy of the Prius. Same dopey shape, same bland style.
A time will come when hybrids actually look good and most people buy them as opposed to regular cars. If the environmental people want more hybrids sold they need to hope auto companies make them look better and lower the price.
The Insight gets good gas mileage compared to regular cars but is off the Prius's high. But the Prius will also run you significantly more. So if you're looking for a cheaper version of the Prius then the Insight is the way to go.
Redesign it from the ground up and get the MPG up to rival the Prius.
When my friend was looking for a new car it came down between the Matrix and the Corolla S version. I checked them both out with her and although the Corolla S won out in the end I was impressed by the Matrix.
Toyota did a media blitz when the Matrix first came out but seeing the car in real life disappointed. It seemed very small and cramped inside. A couple versions later the Matrix is roomier inside and a little bit longer overall.
The salesmen informed us that the Matrix is derived from the Corolla and is sporty, hatch back version of the great selling car. They load the Matrix with tons of helpful and convenient technology and features. There is all kinds of storage within reach of the driver, navigation systems available on all trims, blue tooth and on and on the list goes.
Even though this car is presumably aimed at the urban / younger crowd for some reason my mom loves the way it looks. I can definitely see how someone who is trading in their sedan or SUV because they don't need the size would enjoy a zippy little car like this
It's packed with cool features but you pay for them when it comes to the sticker. A lower price or more trim versions might help sell more of these cool little cars.
The first time I saw a commercial for the Yaris I had no idea what it was exactly. I'm sure most people got that same feeling. I can tell you what it's not. It's definitely not a SUV nor a car. That should technically put it in the land of crossovers, but it really looks different than any cross over I have seen.
It's unique that is for sure. Toyota gave it a good dose of style and from the shots I have seen of the inside it looks very nice.
The Venza is built on the Camry platform so I have heard it drives more like a car; smooth, nimble and agile. It has enough cargo room for groceries, dogs or a trip to Home Depot (and Bed, Bath and Beyond if we have time).
Maybe I'm nit picking here but the thing reminds me of a station wagon from some angles. Sometimes I look at it and see a unique crossover-ish ride that might be the future of the car industry and other times I see a rehashed station wagon.
If you're trying to avoid the minivan trap, don't want an SUV and the crossovers just don't do it for you then the Venza is worth a look. It seems to offer the best of all worlds and is a hell of lot better than a minivan.
It's new and unique but reminds me of a station wagon. If they can find a way to change that I might be in.
I grew up in a Ford truck household so all my life I have preferred them to Chevys. Just like some people are raised in a Conservative or a religious household I grew up in a house where all I knew was Ford trucks.
I have to admit though that when I rode in my buddy's Chevy Silverado 2500 HD to the river I was very impressed. The thought of ever owning a Chevy truck never entered my mind until then. Seeing the Silverado 2500 HD action made me consider my truck upbringing.
My buddy is a diesel mechanic and uses his truck daily for work. He's not one of those dudes who sits behind a desk but likes to feel like a bad ass when he's on the road. If this thing didn't perform he wouldn't own it. The day we left he dropped off a transmission and picked up his boat. Never in the 3 hour drive did the Silverado 2500 HD feel like it wanted for power or torque.
The only thing I'm not wild about is the Chevy styling. I don't know if that years of Ford indoctrination or not. It just doesn't blow my skirt up and seems a little bland to me.
If the looks of the truck do it for you give it a test run to see if it meets your work needs. I don't have the need to buy one but if I did I would risk my Dad not talking to me at Thanksgiving and check one out.
Update the exterior to reflect the trucks aggressive innards.
I had the misfortune of getting one of these little guys as a rental car one time. I guess it didn't help I was going from an SUV to this sub compact go-cart, but I was not loving life.
I felt like Frogger driving on the Southern California freeways in this thing. You don't realize how small and unsafe you are in one of these until a semi comes roaring by. It is literally as close to a go-cart as you can get and still be street legal. It offers very little in the way of style and makes you feel like the cold icy hands of death could reach out and snatch you up at any minute. You can slam on the pedal all you want but don't expect much response.
I get that it is affordable and I'm sure it's good for A to B type driving but I'll C my way out.
Maybe if you live in a big city and you need something to get around in here and there the Aveo is ok. Its go-cart build does make it zippy on surface street conditions. The gas mileage is good, as you would expect with a small car like this. Chevy has also added features like an optional sunroof, a year free XM radio and an AUX jack for your Ipod.
Oh, just about everything. . .
If you love what Lexus has to offer but aren't so concerned about handling and the sporty aspect of your ride then take a look at the ES350. The ES focuses on quality, a quite cabin and smooth ride. The IS350 focuses more on the drive and performance end. No matter what you're looking for Lexus has you covered.
I have driven both IS and ES and its hard to tell which one I would buy. I love the sporty feel of the IS but the ES is dead quiet when driving and sometimes that is nice. The ES is more spacious and focuses on passengers just as much as the driver. There is plenty of room for tall or bigger people in this luxury ride.
The big complaint I hear about the ES is that it reminds them of an old woman's car. True, the one I drove was my grandmas but that doesn't mean its only for old ladies. It's not as sporty as the IS or the IS350 but I still enjoy it. If you have a family and need the extra room for growing kids I'd go for the ES.
The gas mileage could be better.
This was the car everyone fought over when they came into the motor pool! I went as far as to bribe the person in charge of car assignments to make sure I got the XSport version when they came in!
This compact SUV from Suzuki offers a good-sized engine, ample interior space and awesome options and extras. I never drove the smaller 4 cylinder versions, but the 6 cylinder ones were great. Acceleration on the freeway was never an issue. I also never felt unsafe, even driving through snow and all kinds of Midwest nastiness. The 4-wheel drive came in handy in many spots and never let me down.
I also dug the nice touches the Xsport version came with. The moon roof was nice during the warmer months and the six disk changer was cool too. My issues with the entertainment system was that there was no AUX jack for my Ipod. Also the keyless system could be temperamental sometimes. It was supposed to let you start the SUV with the key in your pocket but would often lock up on you.
The only big issue I had with this SUV is the mesh material that covers the seats. It looks cool and gives the ride a sweet look but my labrador's hair would get interlaced in the mesh and it was a pain to get it out.
If you're looking at a RAV 4 or something similar do yourself a favor and check out the Grand Vitara.
Update or get rid of the keyless ignition.
Add navigation system on higher end models.
Add AUX jack to the stereo for Ipod plugins.
There is something about a truck that just makes you feel manlier! I have dreams about breaking out of the cubicle and eating on my tailgate from a lunch box. Oh yeah, that's the stuff. I have always loved trucks but have never had the need for one. I'm just too practical!
Being a truck admirer, I have also enjoyed the Silverado 1500. Many of my friends have owned them and the brand new ones are looking pretty good, comparatively. The problem is the full truck market is filled with aggressive looking trucks trying to steal market share from the F-150 and Silverado. If GM doesn't address this issue with a newer and more aggressive exterior they could look like they are standing still next to the F-150, Tundra and Ram.
People are crazy loyal to their truck companies though and Chevy guys will line up like lemmings to buy the new Silverado. From what I have been told it rides well and comes in a myriad of configurations to meet all your needs. My buddy has the "work trim" with the vinyl floor, which comes in handy if you're transporting greasy air conditioning parts or have a friend who decides Jaeger Bombs are the way to go on his 29th birthday.
No need to mention names. . .
Until I need one for work or buy things that need to be towed I have no excuse to waste the gas money on a truck. If I ever do, I will definitely make a stop at the local Chevy dealer to see what the Silverado has to offer.
Update the exterior! You can't let Dodge outdo you. Think about life Chevy.
The new E class is definitely an improvement from the last version of this car. Mercedes stepped it up for sure with this version. I have always not cared for the brand, to tell you the truth. I have always leaned towards BMW and Lexus when it came to luxury sedans. The new E class did raise my eyebrows though and caused me to scour the internet and forums for more information though.
Since I am no where near buying this car I won't waste a salesperson's time by asking for a test drive, but everything I have heard is all good. The clean lines and redesigned exterior look awesome and really make the car pop. The old version suffered from outdated and neglected styling making it look very bland. Without these massive updates the E class would look like it was standing still next to the BMW and Lexus aggressive style.
In the end I dig this car but I think for the money I would rather go for a 5 series. They have been more consistent over the years.
It's a sweet car, don't get me wrong. Let's see a better price point or more options/power for this price range.
My friend's dad owns one of these. I guess I can't wrap my head around the need to have a truck that is so tricked out it puts some luxury cars to shame.
For me trucks are all about getting dirty, hauling some stuff around for work and towing your boat to the river. I can do all of that with a $25K truck so why do I want to drop almost $50K just to have it plush inside. Modern trucks are uncomfortable or barren inside. Even the "work trim" trucks with vinyl floors are still nice. Maybe I am too practical or something but I see it as a big waste of money. Yes, I am biased towards Ford trucks, but I won't spend money on the Lariat or King Ranch verisons either. I love the irony of buying a big burly truck but you also want to be spoiled and surrounded by plushness!
I'm not a big fan of the Chevy/GMC exteriors in the first place and the Denali seems to emphasize those features to the extreme. It is too boxy and reminds me of the F-150 crew cab from two models ago. It needs an overhaul most of all out of the entire line up.
If you're dead set on getting this style of truck save yourself about $5K and buy the Silverado verison.
Exterior and basic concept need to rethought, at least in my book.
I have to respectfully disagree with Alicat on this one. I have never owned one myself but have had 6 or 7 friends, coworkers and people I know who drive them and have had no problems. In fact I have gotten to arguments with people who try to convince me how much better GMCs are than Chevys. Yeah, chew on that one for awhile.
Back to the subject at hand: The Sierra is a very capable pickup in the areas of towing, payload and overall strength. I have seen it first hand in work and play capacities and it handles itself well in both.
While I am a known Ford truck lover, I can appreciate Chevys and their GMC cousins. I don't like the exterior looks; I just can't get around that one.
I rode in the extended cab version of the latest version of the 1500 Sierra. It was super roomy and left plenty of room for 4 people, gear and refreshments. If you're not a fan of Fords, don't mind spending the extra money on a GMC over a Chevy and like the way they look then this is the truck for you.
It al hinges on the exterior for me. Time for a redesign GMC.
In my fantasy world where I can afford a luxury sedan I can justify the expense because I know I am paying for the luxury and performance of the vehicle. With the LX 570, which is designed to be a mix of off road capabilities and luxury, I just don't see the point. If you're dropping this kind of coin to go off-road why do you need the luxury? If you're paying this money for the luxury, why do you need the off road ability?
It's towing prowess is the only thing that might remotely justify the expense, but even then I don't see it. For roughly the same price you could buy a Tahoe for towing AND a Lexus IS 350 for sport and luxury!
I guess if you're filthy rich and want to go on safari in style this is the way to do it.
I have to admit the idea of having a ice cold beverage box sounds sweet, but not at this price.
Even if money was no object and I didn't mind having a car that I didn't utilize half of it's potential I don't think I would buy this ride. It's not the smoothest looking thing in the Lexus arsenal. They make some sick looking cars and then there is this guy. You can see its outdated Land Cruiser roots showing through all too easy.
Lower the price and change the exterior. Give me more aggession and sleeker lines.
I almost feel bad for liking this car so much. I feel like I am cheating on my dream car, the BMW 7 series. The LS 600h is a tempting mistress and here is why.
The car looks amazing. It has a super long wheel base and awesome center of gravity. These combined add up to great handling and a small turning radius for a big sedan like this. I think other Lexus models look sharper but the lines and style on this car are still "A" worthy.
The engine is straight sick! It puts out insane power. There is some irony combining a V8 with an electric motor, but the total hp is big enough to make this a mover. Plus you end up getting better gas mileage than a BMW 7 series. I'm sure you aren't pinching pennies if you're buying this car but Mother Earth and Al Gore thank you.
The big hurdle to this car is that it is $100K plus. You can get other LS versions for much cheaper but this is the mack-daddy, king of all king Lexus models here. Expect to pay out the nose for it. If I ever win the lottery I am going to have a real choice on my hands. Hey, why not buy the 7 series and the LS600h both?
Nothing. Keep it up!
The Vice President of our company owns a GS460 and has nothing but nice things to say. If you're looking for a strong V8 luxury car with great dependability and high resell value then it seems this is your ride.
If you're ready to bust through the $50K price tag then the GS460 should be on your test drive list. I have never driven nor ridden in one, but upon further interrogation about his new car my VP said it drove as good as it looked.
Some people think the curves are a bit too much but I think it stands out amongst the crowd, even amongst other Lexuses. . .Lexi. . . what is the plural of Lexus? People are never happy though. They criticize the ES for being too boring and the GS for looking to different.
I think it's a sweet looking car. I'm stoked just to be getting a pay check right now in this economy but when I make some more money this car would definitely be on my "must test drive" list. I think it might just give the BMW 5 series a run for its money.
My boss is taller and he says that tall people may not like it. More interior head and shoulders space?
A buddy of mine had just picked one of these bad boys up the last time I flew out to California. Getting picked up from the airport in style just makes you feel awesome! Later that weekend I volunteered to do a beer run. . .if only I had a car!
Jackpot! I didn't go crazy or anything in the IS350 but I had some fun. The paddle shifters are cool and the power is insane. I have to agree with Matt C., this car is flat out fast! The 3.5L engine fires on all cylinders if you enjoy performance. I never drove the IS 250 but it didn't feel anywhere near as fast as the 350. I took some detours on the way there and back and enjoyed a little freeway driving. The handling is great and corners are absolutely no problem.
The back seat is respectable for a sporty sedan and the trunk space was a lot better than the IS250, or so it seemed. I think for the extra money this car is definitely worth it. This Lexus is the closest to competing directly with the BMW 3 series. I would be hard pressed to choose the BMW over this ride.
I'm speachless. This car is perfect.
My buddy's girl friend has one of these and I have gotten to ride in it several times and I have to say it surprised me. I have always enjoyed the Lexus ES series so when the IS came out I was curious as to how they were.
We got picked up from the bar one night in the IS 250 and sitting in the back seat I thought it was a lot more spacious than expected. This might have been a case of alcohol distorting my perceptions, like when something you eat when you're drunk is "the best thing ever". I rode in it again sober and although I was crowded it wasn't as spacious as I thought. In the passenger seat you appreciate the interior and the space a lot more. I can see this car for a young person, young couple or even people with a small kid. They don't need room back there, right? The trunk space was lacking for a sedan this size but unless you're moving serious cargo you're going to be able to work around it.
The exterior and interior style is all kinds of sweet. Lexus came through big time on the looks of this car. The car is sporty and has decent kick when called upon, from what I could tell riding shotgun.
Lexus meant for this ride to compete with the BMW 3 series. It can't go toe to toe with the class leader but for the price it's a great substitute. You get the similar sporty performance but at a discount.
More trunk space, more interior space in the rear seat.
I saw some commercials for the Traverse and while waiting on my wife's car at the dealership the other day got an up close look at one. I didn't take it for a drive or anything but from what I saw I was really impressed.
The Traverse is a crossover that is smaller and gets better gas mileage than large truck based SUVs like the Tahoe or Explorer. This seems to be the way the auto industry is leaning these days.
Although I am a big fan of the large traditional SUVs their gas mileage and cost can be too much these days. The Traverse offers seating for 8, cargo space and decent gas mileage (comparatively).
The crossover sits lower than regular SUVs but still has a raised seating position. All of this combines to give you the best of both worlds.
I have to admit although the exterior and set up looks good the interior is seriously lacking. There are no decent accents and the entire thing just seems drab and boring. I know the government owns them now but their cars don't have to look like the inside of a DMV. The price tag was also really high. The tricked out version topped out at over $41K. That's a hefty price tag for what you're getting.
Work on the interior and the price and we'll talk Chevy. . .
Although I have always loved BMW's for some reason I had a bad taste in my mouth in regards to this sedan. I could never put my finger on it until one day I realized that every tool out there who wanted to rock the BMW name bought the base level one of these cars. I guess I let the general sense of these driver’s douchbaggery get to me and affect my opinion of the car itself.
All of that went away when I got to drive a 3 series belonging to a friend’s girlfriend. I can see why people shell out the money for this car as opposed to getting bigger sedans from companies like Toyota or more performance based cars like the Subaru WRX. The combination of luxury and sportiness is awesome. BMW manages to blend the two worlds well and although they land more on the luxury side the combination is still awesome. The engine response is quick and when combined with the low center of gravity you never feel out of control. Corners are no issue either in the 3 series.
I personally need more space in a sedan given that I have a new family. I can see how people with no families would enjoy this car though.
More back seat and trunk room for my needs. Fold down rear seats would help increase utility too.
A close family friend of ours loves his BMW 7 series and buys a new one every couple of years. In high school I was recruited to take him and my dad to the store on a beer run because no adults were sober enough. As a treat they let me drive the BMW and I fell in love right then.
Ever since that day the BMW 7 series cars have come to symbolize luxury, power and style in my mind. I have always wanted one and have vowed that when I can afford one I am going to spoil myself and get one. Yeah, that day is far off. You know how people dream about what they would do when they win the lottery? My first stop would be at the local BMW dealership.
The V8 in the new 750 puts out and incredible 400hp! The interior defines the words spacious and luxurious. These are large sedans though so if you're looking for something sporty then you need to look at the 5 series.
I guess the only downfall to this ride (besides the daunting 100K price tag) is that the gas mileage isn't all that great. But let's be honest; when I can afford this car I'm not going to be worried about gas prices. Mother Earth can just fend for herself!
I think gas mileage is the only spot they could work on.
It's funny how two people can drive the same car and have radically different opinions of it. I have to respectfully disagree with Felicity and say that I loved the BMW 5 series and would pick it any day over the Mercedes.
A friend of mine owns one and I offered (begged) him to drive a leg of our last long trip to Vegas.
He has the V6 version of the 5 series and the power was insane. I couldn't even imagine what the V8 could do! The engine gives you all you can handle and delivers on demand. The ride is nimble and responsive and although I didn't get to handle any corners (all freeway driving) I have been told it handles great. The 5 series is widly known as the sportiest sedan in this class. They even offer a manual transmission for those who want to get the most out of their driving exerience.
The interior is very well designed and luxry doesn't go far enough to describe it. The 5 series isn't cheap but you get plenty of technology, quality and luxury for your money. If I had the means I would definietly pick one up.
The trunk seemed small for a sedan of that size. I would have liked to see more room back there.
One of the managers at my work drives a S40 and he loves his ride. He frequently goes out of his way to park diagonally across two spots. Yeah, he's that guy. He does it partly because we make fun of him for doing it and partly because he really loves that car.
I've ridden in his S40 on the way to meetings and lunches and I really liked it. Before riding in his car the only Volvo I had ever ridden was an ex-girlfriend's older station wagon so I had a negative impression of them.
The S40's interior was really nice and very roomy for a sedan of its size. The engine seems peppy and I have never gotten the sense that he struggled to get up to speed to merge on the freeway.
With Volvo's reputation for safety, the interior and exterior's style and the performance of the engine I am surprised at the price that these cars go for. I can definitely see why someone with a lower budget would look into one of these over a 3 series or the C class.
I have heard taller people complain they feel cramped in the back seat. I'm 5'10 so it's not an issue for me but something Volvo might want to address.
When I was a kid my dad had a Subaru station wagon and I loved it because he would let me put my hand under his when he shifted and let me think that he was only "helping" me. Those might be some of the best memories I have of my childhood.
So needless to say when my buddy picked up his new Subaru Impreza WRX all I had to was hit him with that little ditty and he let me drive it. He said, "Well I'm not going to hold your hand while you shift so you might as well take it for a spin."
This is definitely not the Subaru I remember from my childhood, but oh man did it kick a**! The engine is beyond powerful and I came nowhere near close to using everything it had to give. The low stance and center of gravity combined with the killer suspension to make for a smooth ride no matter what I was trying to pull.
I knew the Impreza was a performance car but I surprised at how good the interior looked. I also noticed the lack of noise in the cockpit . . .I mean driver's seat.
The Impreza doesn't get as good gas mileage as the Civic but blows it away when it comes to performance and style. The all wheel drive gives you added stability in the snow and ice. My buddy claims he avoided two accidents during the last round of storms we had. I'd say a couple tanks of gas are worth the extra control and avoiding a few accidents here and there.
I could always go for a lower price tag, but come on, let's be real; this car is awesome.
I'll give kudos to Toyota for bringing back the iconic Land Cruiser in this new and very unique look. A security company located near my work has some of these as company vehicles (which makes no sense to me) so I see them drive around a lot. My asked me "Where does that guy work?" To which I had to say "Jurassic Park, by the look of his ride".
Much like a Jeep Wrangler these kinds of cars are best made for those who are ultra outdoorsy and need the suspension, travel and set up this Toyota offers. That's just not me. I don't understand soccer moms that drive H2s so I don't get 9-5 office guy who thinks the Land Cruiser makes him look "adventurous".
If you seriously are looking for a ride to accommodate your hard-core lifestyle then this is probably the ride for you. It comes with easy to clean rubber floors and waterproof seats so you don't have to worry about messing up the seats after a wicked day of kayaking, or whatever you outdoorsy people do on the weekends.
It's a niche vehicle and not meant for most drivers out there. Keep it the way it is if you want to satisfy the core customer. If not ditch some of the safari look and tone it down so the average Joe likes it. Maybe add a trim with real carpeted floors, mats and so on.
Someone in the business park I work in drives one of these little guys. I have had occasion to check it out during a break or two and it's not a bad looking little car.
Yeah, I'm not a small car guy but I get why more people are buying them. Great gas mileage, low cost and convenient in crowded cities. The days of the road being owned by behemoth SUVs is drawing to a close and smaller, more economical cars are here to stay.
Like other Toyotas the Yaris has clean and stylish lines. It doesn't look as modern as the Camry, Avalon or Corolla but it still has some style. From my brief glimpses the interior looks decent too with plenty of storage and good looks to go around.
Chances are most aren't buying a Yaris for it's looks. The gas mileage and price tag are the big selling points. It gets slightly better gas mileage than the Honda fit, but does cost a little bit more.
At the end of the day I would take a look at the Honda Fit instead. Its mileage isn't as good but if you're looking for a more car for less money I think it's the way to go.
Make it a little less plain; add some better trim and maybe a few more options.
In these days of environmental conservation Green seems to be the new religion. I might get burnt at the stake for this, but I can't stand the Prius aka the High Priestess of Hybrid Cars.
I have to agree with previous reviewers the outside looks hideous. Why does the best hybrid car out there have to look like booty? Toyota is capable of making some sweet looking cars yet they force this thing on us that looks like a rejected concept car from 1992.
I've been inside a Prius and they aren't much better. Same story different chapter; I know you can do better Toyota! What's going on there?
My only hope is that as hybrid technology gets cheaper and easier to put in any car more design effort will be put into cars like the Prius.
Another burr under my saddle when it comes to the Prius is the price. That's a lot to pay for something that looks so bad. Especially now that Honda has brought out the Insight that is way cheaper, there is no reason to buy the Prius.
I know it's helping to save the earth . . .blah blah blah. Go tell Al Gore I said if he wants me to drive a hybrid it needs to look better than the Prius.
Style, style, style. . .a thousand times, style!
One of my closest friends purchased the Corolla S model and she loves it. I got to drive the car several times and have to admit it impressed me for a "small car".
Although you'll see a million Toyotas in the parking lot at the Olive Garden, the Gap and other suburban landmarks the company has done a great job designing cars. I love the style and lines on their line typified by the Camry and the Corolla. They are aggressive without being too out there.
The inside of the Corolla continues that feeling. They interior is nicely apportioned and is very spacious. I've been in one when it had four people and some stuff and didn't feel cramped at all. The dash, lights, stereo and everything has a cool chrome trim.
The engine responds well for a 4-cyclinder. Freeway driving never seemed strained or forced. The car manuvers extremely well but never gives you that go-cart feeling. I never once thought I was going to die driving next to a semi. You can get the V6 in the fully loaded version but honestly I don't see the need. You can't beat the gas mileage either.
Between this and my sister's Civic I would take the Corolla every day of the week and twice on Sundays. Great job Toyota!
If you're looking for a small car then this is your pick. I got nothing!
The Jeep Wrangler is like dating a stripper; it sounds awesome, is fun and exciting for a little bit but in the end you just end up bruised and uncomfortable.
Ok maybe that metaphor was a bit of a stretch. Like everyone else in the world I have a friend who owns a Wrangler; everybody knows "that guy". They are far more common in my home land of Southern California than my new Midwest digs. They are perfect for cruising down the Pacific Coast Highway and taking in the sun and sights. But that's about it.
Unless you live on top of a mountain or are going on crazy Indiana Jones style adventures I don't see the point in owning one. Most of use cars to get from point A to point B and C on the weekends. I need more comfort, quiet and safety than a Jeep can offer.
Maybe I'm paranoid but I would never own a car that only takes a pocket knife to break into. If you're young, single, outdoorsy and live in a place that doesn't deal with "4 below" winters then go for it!
Give me some sort of updated interior and exterior. A more comfortable ride would be nice too.
As the focus of the auto industry shifts away from big gas guzzling SUVs and towards smaller cars and crossovers expect to see more vehicles like the Ford Escape on the road.
The Escape is Ford's entry into the small SUV world; intended to compete with the Toyota Rav-4 and Honda CR-V. Unlike these others it is based off of a truck chassis instead of a car sedan one. While some people complain that this makes it less nimble a coworker of mine disagrees. She loves the drive and feels it responds just fine. With the truck chassis you also sit a little higher and have more ground clearance. So if you're actually going to go off road you can do it without freaking out.
I just don't dig the look of the Escape. It's the little brother to the Explorer and Expedition but didn't get any of their good looks. I assume it is meant to the same crowd who like the Rav-4 and CR-V yet it doesn't have that fun and sporty look the other two try to go after. The Escape is boxy and just hasn't been updated enough on the outside.
New styling and better MPG would be killer.
I want to like the Element, I really do. I think I might have been brainwashed by Honda's ad people; I don't like this car yet for some reason I think I should because I'm in my 20's and enjoy outdoor activities. I'm going all Manchurian Candidate over here. . .
If you wrote down all of the features of the Element on a piece of paper it would sound like the perfect car. Roomy on the inside, drives well (from what I have been told) and offers a seemingly endless configuration for seating and cargo.
But unfortunately we are a superficial people aren't we? Yes, I'll admit it looks are very important. If they weren't you would have let your friend set you up with that "really funny and smart" co worker of theirs. The Element just looks so awkward and not cool in the slightest bit. Either its way ahead of it's time or is just plain U-G-L-Y but either way I would never buy one.
In the realms of utility and versatility the Element gets an A, in the worlds of design and looks it fails miserably.
Complete and total design. Tear it down and start over again!
Let me start off by saying I'm not a small car guy. I had a bad rental car experience in a Chevy Aveo and I swore them off for a lifetime. I have to admit the Honda Fit makes me want to change my mind about that.
I've never driven one but have seen it up-close. It's good looking inside and out. Honda did a good job of redesigning this car last year and upgraded the materials used in the interior. I saw the original model once and the interior looked chinsy.
I don't know what it is about the small go cart look of this car but it makes me want to get one and weave in and out of traffic. This style of car definitely does not fit my needs with a growing family so I wouldn't get one. With the slew of safety features it offers I could see how it would be a good car for going to college in.
The gas mileage tops out at around 30 mpg on the highway so if you're a commuter then this is the way to go. I know the dealerships couldn't keep these in stock when gas was over $4.00. It's better now but we all know it will go back one day. I don't blame anyone for embracing the small car revolution.
From what I have seen this car is great if it fits your needs. I would need more back seat room for the kiddies so if they could figure that one out then I might think about it.
One of my sisters looked at this car a lot before she settled on the Rav-4. I personally like the look of the CR-V more than the Rav-4. It has more of that rounded look that I like in an SUV. It has nice lines and looks pretty cool in my opinion.
The seats fold completely flat in this small SUV so if you need to transport anything of size then it's a good choice. Other vehicles in this class I have experienced have seats that fold but not all the way so you get weird inclines in your storage that can lead to problems.
The interior feels large and although it's not a typical full sized SUV I can see how you could haul the kids and some serious groceries in it. I know a lot of people are looking for ways to get away from their gas guzzlers and something like the CR-V offers a lot of attractive options.
I don't know what it is about small SUVs but it seems like every woman I know under 25 thinks they are best thing in the world. That doesn't detract from my opinion of these cars but I just can't explain the fascination.
You need to get the fully loaded version to get all the stuff that makes this SUV great. More options on the lower models would be nice. There also seems to be some sort of vision issues with the construction of the rear end. Honda is known for their saftey and something like that could cause some issues.
My youngest sister has one of these. My stepmom, her and I all drove it from Southern California to Northern California to move her into her dorm freshman year of college. Even with all of my sister's stuff and 3 people it wasn't that bad of a fit. The interior of the 4 door version is a lot roomier than you would expect. The trunk is decent sized too.
My beef with the Honda sedan line up is their lack of exterior and interior style and that rings true for the Civic. The 2 door version looks a little better but Honda needs to step up their game, in my humble opinion.
The Civic responds well on the freeway and has enough get-up-and-go to make you comfortable. It's more like a go cart than a race car though so don't expect too much. The handling is nimble and the braking superb.
My parents ended up being sold on the safety ratings and the gas mileage though. All of the stars aligned and the Civic turned out to be the perfect car for my little sister's college years.
Better external styling is a must if Honda wants to improve this model.
Another new dad I know has an Accord and me, him and the kids took a spin one day. He has the 4 door V6 version and although it's nothing to write about from the exterior it's nice inside.
The engine is quiet and the interior is super roomy. It's almost deceptive how much room you have inside. Two newborn car seats, diaper bags and random stuff we picked up all fit easily in the back seat. The truck handled two strollers but not with a lot of wiggle room.
I wasn't driving so I can't speak to that aspect of the car but it seems responsive. I would stay away from the 4 cylinder though. For that size of a car the 4 banger seems like it would be a dog.
The gas mileage is killer on this car also. My buddy feels like he doesn't hardly ever fill up, but then again his last ride was truck.
I guess my beef with the Accord and Honda in general is that they get so much right on a car but then drop the ball when it comes to looks. If that makes me a superficial car guy then I guess I am!
It's all about improving the look inside and out. Honda needs to start working towards more aggressive styling. Even the Camry looks more with it than the Accord.
I have always had the privilege of having friends who all owned trucks. Besides always being in luck when it's time to move it has allowed me to test drive a lot of their rides. I have always gravitated towards the Ford F-150 as I have always enjoyed the look and functionality of them. The F-150 is aggressive looking enough without being over the top like the Dodge Ram.
I have seen the Ford in many different configurations and the F-150 has always performed extremely well. My friend has the extended cab version but with a simple gate extender we could easily fit three motorcycles and gear in the bed. That's what I love about it. If you want a basic work truck, you got it. If you want a truck you can haul the family in, you got it. Even if you want a luxury truck you got it.
If you're towing anything the F-150 is a no brainer. The F-150 handles just fine going up hills towing a boat and the V8 never feels strained. If you’re looking the F-150 you will need to balance your need for bed space versus your need for passenger seating; the more room for one, the less for the other. Life is full of difficult decisions though, huh?
I don't know why but I'm not crazy about the tailgate. Something about it just rubs me the wrong way. Ford: new tailgate please!
When it comes to big trucks and SUVs I am a Ford guy. I used to own a Ford Expedition and loved driving that beast. But I have to admit the redesigned Tahoe caught my eye when it first came out. A buddy recently purchased one and can't say enough good things about his new ride.
The Tahoe comes in a variety of engine and drive configurations offering users a wide variety of options to choose from. The Tahoe isn't cheap, just like any full sized SUV but you get a lot for your money. Not only do you have a troop transport but you have one of the best haulers out there.
One beef I have and have heard Tahoe owners complain about is the fact that you have to physically remove the third row of seats if you need the area for storage. Fold down seats are way easier and just so much better.
You're never going to get great gas mileage with a full sized SUV but the Tahoe has the Active Fuel Management system that kills 4 of the 8 cylinders to save on gas during less stressful engine use. It may not be much but it adds up and helps out at the pump.
The Tahoe is powerful and quite the looker. If I were to get another full sized SUV it would definitely warrant a closer look before I went to the Ford lot.
Give me a folding third row seat!
I have been driving the Impala for a bit now and I have to say I was very surprised when I first got it. The main reason I bought the Impala was because I got a smokin' deal on it courtesy of my father-in-law, but have grown to really like it.
The Impala doesn't look like much from the outside. It's not boxy by any means but lacks the shape and curves other cars in its class have. Chevy hasn't updated the exterior since 2006 and it shows. I guess I let the outside looks affect my perception of how the ride would be.
I was pleasantly surprised by the engine's get up and go when I got in. I found it to be very responsive and border line sporty for a 6 seater family sedan. It's quicker off the line than you would expect and you don't need to give a second thought to merging on the freeway.
The seating is ample for the family and me. My kid's car seat, my lab and my wife's yappy "dog" all fit just fine back there. I've never had to use the front middle bench seat, but it does seem like would make for a tight fit. I keep the center panel flipped up and use the cup holders instead.
At the end of the day this car doesn't blow you away but is very capable and for the price I couldn't beat it. I also loved getting 19mph city, which is something I didn't see coming in a car with an engine that feels like this.
Better and more modern exterior styling. Chevy needs to import the lines of the new Malibu and it's other cars to this model.
Ford is back on the large sedan scene with the new Taurus. Ford has been plagued by the failure of the Five Hundred and had to take drastic steps to gain some footing in this market.
The Taurus now comes in a variety of trims, engine sizes and configurations, but the one you see the most on TV is the SHO model. The SHO model comes with all of the bells and whistles but is going to run you in the high $30K range, so unless you're willing to shell out some serious cash then you might want to consider a smaller version.
The Taurus has an insane amount of interior space. The rear seats and passenger seat fold down for a lot of storage space. This kind of cargo space on a large sedan and the stylish new design make it worth a trip to the dealership to check them out. My wife saw it on Ellen and couldn’t stop talking about it; until I told her the price tag!
Ford has done a great job recreating this sedan but at the end of the day you are shelling out a lot of money and are getting into the range of the Toyota Avalon and other better competitors. Unless you just can't live without it, I don't see the point.
It's a great car, I just don't think they will sell a lot at this price point.
My grandpa had the 2009 Equinox and a friend of mine owns the 2010 version so I have had the opportunity to drive both models. With better handling and updated styling the new Equinox is all kinds of cool.
I drew the short straw and got to be designated driver on game day and the 2010 Equinox was our chariot for the day. It fit 5 guys and a bunch of tailgating supplies with no problem.
I still don't like the last row of seats and wouldn't want to be stuck back there but it can still accommodate mildly tall people. I'd recommend only using those seats if you absolutely need them. Fold them down and use the rear area as storage. It's much better that way.
The ride on the Equinox is good and the power delivery is decent. Of course stepping up to the V6 will give you some more kick and I highly recommend it. The four cylinder version isn't sluggish by any means so if you're looking to save some cash or care about the environment then you can head down that path.
The Equinox offers awesome style, capable driving and plenty of cargo room inside all at a decent price. My wife and I have already discussed making this our next auto purchase because we'll do anything to avoid the dreaded minivan!
A more spacious 3rd row of seats.
I haven't driven the Camry yet but the suburban dad in me just can't get enough of this car. Toyota did well with the new design, borrowing lines and style from the Euros without seeming too much like a BMW knockoff.
The Camry is the country's best selling sedan and that is for a reason. They are dependable, stylish and long lasting. You pay more up front but you get more in the long run.
Inside and out the Camry looks clean and sleek. They offer several different trims and engine configurations, even a hybrid model. The loaded version is going to set you back almost $30K, so for about the same price I'd prefer to get the much larger, roomier and more quiet Avalon.
I know it's petty and kind of silly but my biggest beef with the Camry is that they are everywhere. On one hand the popularity tells you how great the car is but on the other hand it just sucks to see a mall parking lot full of them. Its bad enough I live in a track house that looks like my neighbor's, do we have to drive the same car too?
Not too much. The Camry is pretty much firing on all cylinders. I doubt the nice people at Toyota would agree to make less.
My little sister owns a Rav 4, she took it college with her. We had to switch cars for a few days and I was really disappointed by the Rav 4. Toyota usually produces a superior automobile and I guess I expected the Rav 4 to be better than what it was.
I'm looking past the fact that I see it as a "chick car". I'm not judging it on that by any means or the fact that my little sister drives it. I found the interior to be poorly designed and cheap looking. The exterior doesn't own any of that Toyota style. They have been pumping out great looking cars for the last couple of years, like the new Camry and the Tundra. I would think they would give it a more modern look with better lines and a more aggressive sporty look. It reminds me of a small Trailblazer.
The engine seemed to struggle when I needed it to be there. I had serious issues merging onto the freeway with the AC going and a small load in the cargo area. She does have the 4 cylinder version though, so maybe those concerns would be answered with the V6 model.
For the price and what you get I'd rather have a Suzuki Grand Vitara. I didn't feel like the interior cabin offered any more room than the Suzuki and the style just threw me off.
Redo the exterior, give it more room inside and give the engine a little more "umph".
Convincing most truck drivers that a Toyota is just as good or better than their American pickup is like trying to convince a Bud Light drinker that Coors Light tastes better. You can talk until you are blue in the face, it's just not going to happen.
A friend of mine bought his new Tundra when he joined the fire department and he has never had a bad thing to say about it. I spent some time poking and proding it when he first picked it up and Toyota did a great job of making a solid full size truck. They finally stopped trying to convince people that a 7/8 size truck was the way to go.
The Tundra delivers in the areas of towing, power and payload and is very comparable to the Chevy, Ford and Dodge full size trucks. The Tundra stands out when it comes to interior and exterior styling in my opinion. Toyota did a killer job of making this truck look aggressive on the outside and luxurious on the inside. I spent 3 hours in the back seat of the extended cab on the way to Vegas and never had a single complaint.
The only area that the Tundra disappoints is fuel efficiency. The other auto makers are figuring out ways to give us the big trucks and SUVs we want with better gas mileage. Why can't Toyota get on board?
For all of those waving the American flag and saying they don't want to buy a foriegn truck, the Tundra is made in Texas. Go capitailism!
Put some of that Japanese know how into improving the MPG of this bad boy.
My grandma owns an Avalon (I'm not sure on the trim) and man is it awesome. It's so great to drive me and the other kids fight over who gets to go to the store to pick something up for a holiday dinner. The Avalon is about 6 inches longer than the Camry and way bigger inside. The price is obviously more, but for what you get it's totally worth it. If you're looking for affordable luxury and can't or won't spring for a BMW or Mercedes then this is the way to go.
Luckily, I have been free from serious traffic for a couple of years now but if I ever had to return to the grid lock that is the Southern California commute I would have to get an Avalon. The interior is awesomely designed and the huge cabin makes you feel at ease no matter what is going on outside. The responsive and powerful V6 gets where you need to go while the sound dampening cabin keeps you oblivious to what is going on outside.
I can't say enough good things about the Avalon. If you're looking at the Camry but don't want to drive the same car that's in half of the driveways in your neighborhood check out this larger sedan.
I am at a loss for words. I'm not really sure. The Avalon is all kinds of cool, brother.
I used to work with a guy who bought one of these and I got to do a walk around with him. All in all I was just not impressed.
The Armada sells itself as a big, bold and strong SUV but a lot seems to only go skin deep. The exterior styling is ok but nothing to write home about. The sheet metal that the body is made of is not very durable. My friend showed me where he dented the lift gate by simply shutting it! How are you supposed to expect this "rugged" SUV to tolerate nasty road conditions and whatever the world can throw at you if it can't tolerate a 160lb dude shutting the back door?
The Armada doesn't have the best gas mileage either, from what I am told. Nissan is not making the same strides that others are making in getting better fuel efficiency and it shows. On top of all of that the Armada comes at a pretty hefty price tag. You can get a more durable Tahoe with better gas mileage for less money.
Sorry Nissan the Armada has sailed for me. I'll stick with the Tahoe or Expedition.
Start over from the ground up! More specifically they need to work on the fuel efficiency, durability and internal styling.
A buddy of mine owns a new Trailbalzer and he can't say enough good things about it. I've had occasion to ride in it on the way to work lunches and the best thing about this SUV is the ride. The 270 hp engine has good pick up and there is a noticeable lack of that "bouncy" truck feel you get sometimes.
I've seen the four wheel drive in action in the snow and it seems to perform very well. The storage is really nice, making trips to Home Depot no problem even to pick up some lumber.
My main issue with the Trailblazer is the exterior. It has the look of the old Tahoe and Suburban. I never liked those rides and the Trailblazer just never shed that style. The new Tahoe looks all kinds of cool and I don't know why Chevy hasn't updated the Trailblazer. With the growing popularity of crossovers and the decrease in demand for large SUVs the Trailblazer may find itself unneeded by Government Motors.
Price is another issue as well. The loaded Trailblazer is more expensive than a moderately equipped Tahoe. For the same money I'd rather rock the Tahoe.
Update and improve the exterior; think Tahoe/Suburban's new look.
The Ford F-250 Super Duty brings the pain in the truck world! These things are huge even in their smaller V-8 versions. The F-250 and its ridiculous F-350 brethren are pure work trucks.
Unfortunately, a lot of Napoleon-esque guys out there loving buying the biggest trucks they can get their hands on whether they need it or not. I've never understood the train of thought that correlates the size of your truck to your manliness. If you were not doing serious hauling, towing or work why would you spend the money on a truck like this?
Starting at $24,000 and going all the way into the $50,000 range these trucks are going to put a hurt on your wallet. Why would you buy them unless you need every ounce of power they can put out? You can get a better equipped, less gas guzzling F-150 for way less.
I've never driven one myself but their owners speak very well of these trucks. The suspensions are a spot of special praise. If you're doing some serious work or towing a giant boat or fifth wheel then this is the truck you should be driving. Just be warned you are going to be punished every time you go to the gas pump.
Better gas mileage, but in a truck this size that's not likely.
Does everyone's mom or mother in law own one of these things? My mother in law does and I have had the opportunity to give it a test drive from time to time.
I guess I expected a lot more from a Lexus, but I wasn't overwhelmed at all by this crossover. It has ample storage and back seat seating isn't cramped at all. I didn't think the handling was exceptional nor did the engine impress me. Don't get me wrong, it's not a bad ride or anything I just expected more. I did have to give the breaks the business due to some ice and came out unscathed so I will give the RX a thumbs up for that.
I guess my biggest gripe with these crossovers is that they just seem to be everywhere. I don't want to be "that guy" but I just get turned off by a car when the entire mall parking lot is filled up with them.
I am not a big guy (5'10) but I felt very cramped in the front seat even after adjusting it. I felt as though the center console crowded me and that Lexus was trying to force a cockpit feeling on me. I just could not get used to the ergonomics of it.
All in all Lexus makes a decent crossover but for the money I would rather get something else.
Give me more elbow room in the front seat. I felt trapped!
Make more options and variations so I don't see the same car everywhere I go.
I owned the 2003 Expedition and have loved them ever since. I had an opportunity to drive the 2009 model and am still very impressed. Ford hasn't missed a beat and has only made a good thing better.
Yeah it's not green and maybe isn't the best thing for the planet but then again chili cheese fries aren't the best thing for me either and I still eat them. While many people are shying away from big SUVs and looking at smaller crossovers or hybrids those won't cut it for some of us. If you have something to tow, a lot of kids or cargo to haul or need the internal space then only a full sized SUV will do. Now that soccer moms aren't lining up to buy full sized SUVs chances are you can get a better deal on them. They have fallen out of favor and you can take advantage.
If you're doing any kind of towing you need the 5.4L V-8. I towed a boat in the one I was driving and it gave me no trouble whatsoever. The 4-wheel drive is also nice if things are a little slippery out there.
My favorite option on the Expedition is the fold flat seats. No need to unbolt and remove the seats like the GM competitors.
Better gas mileage would be great, but I just don't see it happening anytime soon. Maybe a hybrid verison?
I never paid the Cobalt much mind until a coworker of mine picked one up. Her family got it as a second car and she uses it primarily as a commuter. The gas mileage and price were right and she has nothing but good things to say about it.
The Cobalt has a sporty looking exterior. The interior isn't all that great looking though, and I wasn't impressed. I have ridden in the Cobalt before and found the interior to be roomy. The engine seemed responsive as well, but like I said I was only riding.
With a price tag starting in the low $15,000's the Cobalt is a perfect car for a less expensive second car, car for your kid or if you're looking to downgrade. It's not going to give you the luxury and options other cars will but it will definitely get you from point A to point B. If you don't need, don't care for or can't afford a car with the bells and whistles the Cobalt is worth a look. I doubt I would buy one myself though, given the fact that I have a growing family and often find myself transporting kids and the dogs.
The Cobalt needs a better looking interior.
My wife decided to see who would win in a fight between the garage wall and my driver's side mirror. While I was at the dealership getting the loser fixed I had the opportunity to check out the 2010 Malibu.
The floor model was the LTZ V6 version and I was super impressed. I liked what Chevy did with the Malibu for 2009. Even though the hybrid model (dropped for retail sale for 2010) got a lot of the attention the regular version of the car was a huge departure from previous Malibus.
The new version of Chevy's smaller sedan is longer and bigger than its predecessors. I didn't get a chance to drive it but given its new size you'd want to get the optional V6 LT or LTZ version. The 4-cylinder version was a dog in the smaller Malibu so I couldn't imagine it in this larger version.
The interior was all kind of sweet! The LTZ had an awesome two-tone pattern that really blew me away.
The price tag isn't outrageous but is getting close to the prices of cars like the Camry. The MPG estimates looked good too, saving you a few bucks down the road.
If you're in the market for a family sedan you should swing by a Chevy dealer (if there is still one in your town) and check out the 2010 Malibu.
A lower price tag would be a lot easier sell.
I got to drive a lot of different versions of the XL-7 for company cars and I have to say I was never really impressed.
First things first, unless you are referring to 7 Chinese gymnasts there is no way 7 people can fit comfortably in this crossover. So it's a stretch calling it a XL-7. XL-5.5 would probably be more appropriate. I folded the third row seats down and used the area as a cargo area. This posed it's own problems as the seats fold completely flat so you end up with an incline going on in the back of your ride. Not good for keeping things in place.
Suzuki did a good job of making the XL-7 not look like the Chevy Equinox that is was based off of. It's a little longer and bigger but from some angles reminds you of a minivan. The exterior design is nice and is approaching stylish.
The biggest draw for this crossover is its price tag. If you like this class of vehicle but the budget is a little tight then it's definietly worth checking out. The company slams a lot of technology like a navigation system, XM radio and rear DVD system in the more tricked out models.
I never had one of these rides for more than 20,000 miles but after 13,000 you'd start to see and hear some wear and tear. There were things creaking and shaking loose all over.
More ample rear seating to truly fit seven people.
Overall better quality to avoid the annoying sounds after the 10K mile mark.